Archive for July, 2005
Eliminating the Supreme Court as a Standing Body?
5 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser July 4th, 2005 in Law and SocietyIn my post Weaken the Court, Strengthen the Rule of Law, I argued that the hierarchical nature of the law does not require a similarly hierarchical structure of the courts. Now let me take this one step further: Why not eliminate the Supreme Court as a standing body altogether? Inevitable circuit splits would be resolved […]
Weaken the Court, Strengthen the Rule of Law
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser July 2nd, 2005 in Law and SocietyBoth Larry Solum and Brian Tamanaha have posted thoughtful comments regarding Justice O’Connor’s resignation. Both are concerned that we will soon witness an all-out war over her replacement, focused squarely on the ideology of the appointee, as opposed to, say, genuinely judicial virtues such as a demonstrated history of impartiality and fairness. And, of course, […]
Tamanaha’s Descent Into Instrumentalism
0 Comments Published by Manfred Gabriel July 2nd, 2005 in JurisprudenceFollowing up on drhfk’s comments, here are some further thoughts on the Pervasive Perils of Instrumentalism. According to Brian Tamanaha’s excellent article, there was a shift two hundred years ago, and law transformed from being formalist into been instrumentalist. I have two wrinkles to add: the role of constitutionalism and the historical resistance to […]
Migrating a WordPress SQL Database from One Server to Another
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser July 1st, 2005 in AdminRead the instructions and follow them. In most instances, you should be fine. However, some combinations of MySQL, phpMyAdmin, and PHP seem to cause all sorts of mischief. The most common problems are misformed SQL commands upon import. For example, my source host (Globat, slow as molasses) exported the first SQL command of the Law […]
How Can Punishment Be An Intrinsic Good?
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser July 1st, 2005 in Theories of PunishmentI am not saying that punishment should be justified in retributive terms, because retributivism captures some of our intuitions, an argument that would imply a norm, validating empirical evidence as support for a normative claim…. Retributive theories do in fact correctly capture and express certain common emotional reactions to crime and punishment, which explains ‚Äì not justifies ‚Äì their persistence.
Search
Latest
- Law & Society Blog Now in Maintenance Mode
- So blame the joke
- Philosophers on YouTube
- Your Closet’s Scarier Than Bush’s Agenda: Gotta Love NYC
- Confessions of a Knut Fan
- Newsweek Poll: 91% believe in God; 78% believe that God Was Involved in Creating Humans; and, yes, the Year is 2007, not 1507
- Westward ho! Moving from New York to San Francisco
- Comments on Spencer Brown … now in Italian!
- Brilliant Animated Video About the Encroaching Surveillance State
- The Market and the Leviathan: Changing Incentives to Bring About Cooperation
Categories
- Admin (10)
- Carpe Diem (1)
- Constructivism (4)
- Culture (38)
- Flusser (1)
- Hobbes (4)
- Jurisprudence (71)
- Kant (6)
- Law and Economics (16)
- Law and Society (91)
- Philosophy (53)
- Privacy (7)
- System Theory (6)
- Theories of Punishment (18)
- Uncategorized (17)
Posts by author
About
You are currently browsing the Law & Society Blog weblog archives for July, 2005.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.Archives
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
Hosted by SiteGround
