Archive for May, 2005
What Now? Europe After the “non” of 2005
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser May 30th, 2005 in Law and SocietyWith the French 55-45% “no” vote to the European constitution, one of the great experiments in post WWII history has come to an end, the idea that economic integration could overcome a past defined by political division. Much of the vote was driven by the fear of losing characteristic national political entitlements (benefitting some, disadvantaging […]
Formalism, Instrumentalism, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey
0 Comments Published by Manfred Gabriel May 26th, 2005 in JurisprudenceCommenting on Larry Solum’s Legal Theory Lexicon entry on Formalism and Instrumentalism, drhfk recommends recasting the debate as the distinction between first and second order oberservation. This distinction derives from systems theory (particularly Luhmann), and rests on the concept that a social system (such as law) is marked by a fundamental dichotomy (such as “lawful/unlawful”) […]
A Defense of Formalism from a Systems Theory Point of View
2 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser May 26th, 2005 in JurisprudenceFollowing up on a post by Larry Solum and other posts in this blog (for example here and here), I would like to explore what I consider to be a sensible theory of legal formalism.
In order to understand legal formalism, it is helpful to begin with a rough sketch of the core features of legal […]
Solum on Formalism and Instrumentalism
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser May 24th, 2005 in JurisprudenceLarry Solum posted an entry on Formalism and Instrumentalism in his excellent Legal Theory Lexicon. Here is a taste:
The core idea of formalism is that the law (constitutions, statutes, regulations, and precedent) provide rules and that these rules can, do, and should provide a public standard for what is lawful (or not). … [In contrast:] […]
From Justice to Freedom: Changing Paradigms in the Theory of Punishment.
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser May 22nd, 2005 in Hobbes, Philosophy, Theories of PunishmentHe could be killed, mutilated, maimed, brandished, locked up, sent into exile, etc.The collapse of Aristotelian substantive ontology in the late 17th Century (brought about by Galileo, Newton, Leibnitz, and others), also led to a collapse of the corresponding social ontology and its theory of punishment…. Freedom (that is, negative freedom or freedom from), replaced justice as the central criterion of legitimacy.As the new monistic ontology was unable to account for qualitative differences between individuals, the exclusion of the criminal on ontological grounds was no longer plausible.
Are Complex Organizations Capable of Irony?
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser May 21st, 2005 in Law and SocietyAlong the ceiling of the long walkway connecting the Port Authority and the Times Square subway stations runs a poem: “Overslept, so tired. If late, get fired. Why bother? Why the pain? Just go home. Do it again.”
Who put this exquisitely depressing statement of alienation on M.T.A. property? Given the official looks of the signs, […]
I have previously developed the thought the experience of the Frontier and the duel in particular, show that in America law and society as cultural phenomena are understood in terms of inclusion and exclusion. I called this the edge of the law, refering to the sense that there is an area outside the law and […]
Retributivism Proves Too Much
0 Comments Published by Manfred Gabriel May 17th, 2005 in Theories of PunishmentDrhfk writes:
I am not sure that framing the justification debate in terms of rights against the state for protection is particularly helpful. Those rights, I would argue, are derivative of the state’s right to punish criminals. And whether such rights are morally defensible is the issue. … I do agree with Bloomfield’s observation that the […]
Response to “The Need to Punish”
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser May 17th, 2005 in Theories of PunishmentWhile I greatly appreciate Bloomfield’s addition of the bears that shoot laser beams out of their eyes to the cast of characters that appear in the discourse about the justification of punishment (such as the ubiquitous small-town Sheriff who, in order to prevent a murderous riot, sacrifices an innocent person to the mob), I am […]
Consumer Sovereignty: Rationally Choosing the Least Unappealing Set of Available Goods?
0 Comments Published by Hanno Kaiser May 15th, 2005 in Law and Economics[Law & Economics] In 1956 the Supreme Court concluded that DuPont, accused by the government of having monopolized the market for cellophane, did not have sufficient market power, because, in a properly defined product market, it was unable to raise prices profitably, that is, so many customers would have stopped buying the firm’s products (or would have bought less) that the higher prices extracted from the loyal customers would not have made up for the loss…. Moreover, my choices of the least unappealing alternatives will, if others share my preferences, provide incentives for producers to supply more of what I want, and to expand or shift the set of available options in a direction that will provide greater value to me, given my set of preferences.Which brings me to an important point about the goals of antitrust policy.
Search
Latest
- Law & Society Blog Now in Maintenance Mode
- So blame the joke
- Philosophers on YouTube
- Your Closet’s Scarier Than Bush’s Agenda: Gotta Love NYC
- Confessions of a Knut Fan
- Newsweek Poll: 91% believe in God; 78% believe that God Was Involved in Creating Humans; and, yes, the Year is 2007, not 1507
- Westward ho! Moving from New York to San Francisco
- Comments on Spencer Brown … now in Italian!
- Brilliant Animated Video About the Encroaching Surveillance State
- The Market and the Leviathan: Changing Incentives to Bring About Cooperation
Categories
- Admin (10)
- Carpe Diem (1)
- Constructivism (4)
- Culture (38)
- Flusser (1)
- Hobbes (4)
- Jurisprudence (71)
- Kant (6)
- Law and Economics (16)
- Law and Society (91)
- Philosophy (53)
- Privacy (7)
- System Theory (6)
- Theories of Punishment (18)
- Uncategorized (17)
Posts by author
About
You are currently browsing the Law & Society Blog weblog archives for May, 2005.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.Archives
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
Hosted by SiteGround
