<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detention of Enemy Combatants: A Reply to Eugene Volokh</title>
	<link>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/87</link>
	<description>Notes from the intersection of law, society, technology, economics, and culture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Milhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/87#comment-25</link>
		<author>Milhouse</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/87#comment-25</guid>
		<description>In early 1944, could you have predicted how long WW2 would go on?  It could conceivably have taken decades to defeat the Japanese, if not the Germans.  Does that mean it was "morally impermissible" to hold POWs captured in 1939, without any trial or judicial proceeding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In early 1944, could you have predicted how long WW2 would go on?  It could conceivably have taken decades to defeat the Japanese, if not the Germans.  Does that mean it was &#8220;morally impermissible&#8221; to hold POWs captured in 1939, without any trial or judicial proceeding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
