<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decoding Judicial Self Restraint</title>
	<link>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/38</link>
	<description>Notes from the intersection of law, society, technology, economics, and culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Antitrust Review &#187; Market Power or Monopoly Power? A Response to Josh Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/38#comment-727</link>
		<author>Antitrust Review &#187; Market Power or Monopoly Power? A Response to Josh Wright</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 19:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/38#comment-727</guid>
		<description>[...] (Note: Whether we should hold on to the model of perfect competition even as a conceptual starting point in light of an economy that is increasingly characterized by oligopolies and differentiated products is another matter. It may even be a different matter for economics than it is for the law. The law is free to selectively import those concepts that are useful for its purposes. More on that specific autonomy of the law here and here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Note: Whether we should hold on to the model of perfect competition even as a conceptual starting point in light of an economy that is increasingly characterized by oligopolies and differentiated products is another matter. It may even be a different matter for economics than it is for the law. The law is free to selectively import those concepts that are useful for its purposes. More on that specific autonomy of the law here and here.) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
