<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy and Security: A False Dichotomy</title>
	<link>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/303</link>
	<description>Notes from the intersection of law, society, technology, economics, and culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Hanno Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/303#comment-4853</link>
		<author>Hanno Kaiser</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/303#comment-4853</guid>
		<description>Many staunch supporters of the &lt;em&gt;person-centric&lt;/em&gt; approach to security are obsessed with the idea that there are &lt;em&gt;essentially&lt;/em&gt; bad people, that is people whose very nature it is to &lt;em&gt;be&lt;/em&gt; evil. For those essentialists, the real battle is not to prevent certain &lt;em&gt;acts&lt;/em&gt; of terror but to identify and incapacitate &lt;em&gt;terrorists&lt;/em&gt;. Preventing &lt;em&gt;bad acts&lt;/em&gt; from occurring should be at the heart of every rational anti-terrorism policy. Chasing &lt;em&gt;bad people&lt;/em&gt; is mostly a waste of time, for one because we simply don't have a model that reliably ties manifestations of &lt;em&gt;essential badness&lt;/em&gt; (whatever that might be) to the future commission of &lt;em&gt;bad acts.&lt;/em&gt; We don't even have such a model for ordinary run of the mill crimes! How can we expect to have one for acts of terror? But, of course, chasing &lt;em&gt;evil people&lt;/em&gt; plays well with a superstitious, frightened audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many staunch supporters of the <em>person-centric</em> approach to security are obsessed with the idea that there are <em>essentially</em> bad people, that is people whose very nature it is to <em>be</em> evil. For those essentialists, the real battle is not to prevent certain <em>acts</em> of terror but to identify and incapacitate <em>terrorists</em>. Preventing <em>bad acts</em> from occurring should be at the heart of every rational anti-terrorism policy. Chasing <em>bad people</em> is mostly a waste of time, for one because we simply don&#8217;t have a model that reliably ties manifestations of <em>essential badness</em> (whatever that might be) to the future commission of <em>bad acts.</em> We don&#8217;t even have such a model for ordinary run of the mill crimes! How can we expect to have one for acts of terror? But, of course, chasing <em>evil people</em> plays well with a superstitious, frightened audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
