Law & Society Blog

Check out David Robinson’s post Rethinking DRM Dystopia over at the ever excellent Freedom to Tinker blog. David’s conclusions are relatively similar to my musings about compensating customers for third party lock-in effects.

What are the lessons here? Personally, I feel like I underestimated the power of the market to solve the possible problems raised by DRM. It appears that the “lock in” phenomenon creates a powerful incentive for competitors to invest heavily in acquiring new users, even to the point of buying them out. Microsoft is obviously the most powerful player in the technology field, and perhaps some will argue it is unique in its ability to make this kind of an offer. But I doubt that — if the Zune launch is a success, it will set a powerful precedent that DRM buyouts can be worthwhile. And even Microsoft were unique in its ability to offer a buyout, the result in this case is that we’ll have two solid, competing platforms, each one vertically integrated. It’s no stretch of the imagination to think Apple may respond with a similar offer to lure Zune users to iTunes. Bottom line: Markets are often surprisingly good at sorting out this kind of thing. Technology policy watchers underestimate the power of competition at our peril. It’s easy to see Microsoft or Apple as established firms coasting on their vertically integrated dominance, but the Zune buyout is a powerful reminder that that’s not what it feels like to be in this or most any other business. These firms, even the biggest, best and most dominant, are constantly working hard to outdo one another. Consumers often do very well as a result… even in a world of DRM.

I really like the term “DRM buyout.” Here’s a meme to watch!

Technorati Tags: DRM buyout, itunes, music

License

This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.5 License.