Comments on: Legal Reasoning: All Legal Arguments Have the Same Objective http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/125 Notes from the intersection of law, society, technology, economics, and culture Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:56:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 By: John P. Rooney http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/125#comment-2752 John P. Rooney Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:47:51 +0000 http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/125#comment-2752 The distinction between 'external' and 'internal' has been highlighted in jurisprudence texts for some time, e.g., Patton in 1940 or thenabouts. I wrote about this distinction in my Polish Legal Theory and Polish Legal Semiotics in the early 90s. This was preliminary to my review of Jerzy Wroblewski's analytical jurisprudence. I talked about JW at the Bologna IVR and about Petrazycki at the NY Congress. Also at Kevelson's Round Tables. The distinction between ‘external’ and ‘internal’ has been highlighted in jurisprudence texts for some time, e.g., Patton in 1940 or thenabouts.
I wrote about this distinction in my Polish Legal Theory and Polish Legal Semiotics in the early 90s. This was preliminary to my review of Jerzy Wroblewski’s analytical jurisprudence.
I talked about JW at the Bologna IVR and about Petrazycki at the NY Congress. Also at Kevelson’s Round Tables.

]]>