<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solum&#8217;s Outline of the Coase Theorem</title>
	<link>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/114</link>
	<description>Notes from the intersection of law, society, technology, economics, and culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Samuel Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/114#comment-4356</link>
		<author>Ben Samuel Nelson</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lawsocietyblog.com/archives/114#comment-4356</guid>
		<description>Isn't that explanation invalid on its own terms? In scenario B, where the plaintiff has to pay for externalities, he also must pay an inducement fee (one dollar, in this example). Isn't that less "efficient" than scenario A, where the accused has to pay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that explanation invalid on its own terms? In scenario B, where the plaintiff has to pay for externalities, he also must pay an inducement fee (one dollar, in this example). Isn&#8217;t that less &#8220;efficient&#8221; than scenario A, where the accused has to pay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
