Here is a very brief, highly readable explanation of the critical insight underlying the Coase theorem, courtesy of Larry Solum.
License
This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.5 License.
Notes from the intersection of law, society, technology, economics, and culture
Here is a very brief, highly readable explanation of the critical insight underlying the Coase theorem, courtesy of Larry Solum.
This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.5 License.
Isn’t that explanation invalid on its own terms? In scenario B, where the plaintiff has to pay for externalities, he also must pay an inducement fee (one dollar, in this example). Isn’t that less “efficient” than scenario A, where the accused has to pay?